University of Isfahan Journal of Applied Sociology 2008-5745 22 2 2011 06 22 The Relation between the Types of Religiosity and Social Capital (The Oretical and Empirical Approach Among the People of Kashan City) The Relation between the Types of Religiosity and Social Capital (The Oretical and Empirical Approach Among the People of Kashan City) 95 120 18226 FA Mohammad Ganji Assistant Professor, Department of Sociology, University of Kashan Mina Halali Sotodeh M.A. in Sociology , Tarbiat Moallem University of Tehran Journal Article 2016 06 14 The article sought to demonstrate the relation between several types of religiosity and social capital. Now the problem is that what is the relation between different types of religiosity and social capital .The cause of attention to this matter is the emphasis on being religion as one the most important sources of social capital in different approaches of social sciences. According to this fact there has been a growing interest in religion, its changes and its consequences in the recent years. Despite of descularism has been rejected by "Berger" and he has known individual compass safe from influence of secularer power, but the aim of this research is the cognition of consequences that will appear if religion put away from social science. This matter is ignored with consideration of individual religiosity powerful. The article apply 'Fukuyama' and 'Putnam' theory and noting to social capital dimension (trust, solidarity and participation), through the survey study, it try to study the relation between known types of religiosity(informal religiosity ,Juridical-political religiosity, Committal- dependency religiosity, ritual religiosity, Pluralism religiosity, Combinational religiosity, immediacy religiosity) and social capital in statistical universe. In this research we consider our statistical universe as Kashan city through which quota sampling and Cochran formula selected 383 subjects as a sample size from the whole of city. The results show that the types of religiosity that include collective traits have positive relation with social capital and those include individual traits has negative relation with it. The article sought to demonstrate the relation between several types of religiosity and social capital. Now the problem is that what is the relation between different types of religiosity and social capital .The cause of attention to this matter is the emphasis on being religion as one the most important sources of social capital in different approaches of social sciences. According to this fact there has been a growing interest in religion, its changes and its consequences in the recent years. Despite of descularism has been rejected by "Berger" and he has known individual compass safe from influence of secularer power, but the aim of this research is the cognition of consequences that will appear if religion put away from social science. This matter is ignored with consideration of individual religiosity powerful. The article apply 'Fukuyama' and 'Putnam' theory and noting to social capital dimension (trust, solidarity and participation), through the survey study, it try to study the relation between known types of religiosity(informal religiosity ,Juridical-political religiosity, Committal- dependency religiosity, ritual religiosity, Pluralism religiosity, Combinational religiosity, immediacy religiosity) and social capital in statistical universe. In this research we consider our statistical universe as Kashan city through which quota sampling and Cochran formula selected 383 subjects as a sample size from the whole of city. The results show that the types of religiosity that include collective traits have positive relation with social capital and those include individual traits has negative relation with it. https://jas.ui.ac.ir/article_18226_7663b1ea998822bcec0c83f203a6a1a0.pdf